Atlanta's Elite Fashion and Entertainment Consultants

The Taking Of Pelham 123 720p Movies

The Taking Of Pelham 123 720p Movies ->>->>->> http://urllio.com/r0m65

Original Title: The Taking Of Pelham 123

Genge: Action,Crime,Thriller

In early afternoon, four armed men hijack a subway train in Manhattan. They stop on a slight incline, decoupling the first car to let the rest of the train coast back. Their leader is Ryder; he connects by phone with Walter Garber, the dispatcher watching that line. Garber is a supervisor temporarily demoted while being investigated for bribery. Ryder demands $10 million within an hour, or he'll start shooting hostages. He'll deal only with Garber. The mayor okays the payoff, the news of the hostage situation sends the stock market tumbling, and it's unclear what Ryder really wants or if Garber is part of the deal. Will hostages, kidnappers, and negotiators live through this?
Armed men hijack a New York City subway train, holding the passengers hostage in return for a ransom, and turning an ordinary day's work for dispatcher Walter Garber into a face-off with the mastermind behind the crime.
I'm confused about travolta being involved in wall street, and why towards the end when he gets in the taxi cab and checks his laptop he has over 350,000,000? Maybe i missed something or maybe because i live in louisiana and i don't know much about wall street. All that aside i thought this movie was really good. I really liked the fast paced camera shots and the editing. I also love to see travolta play a villain. His performance was a little better than denzels in my opinion even though denzel is one of my favorite actors of all time. I've also grown to love tony scott/denzel washington films. I think they collaborate perfectly and have a really good understanding of the direction they both want to take their films.
Although I found the movie compelling enough to get me through my elliptical workout, I wonder if I missed something by not reading the book or seeing the original movie? Denzel Washington's character was apparently supposed to be a real good guy just trying to support his family, even if it caused him to bend the rules to do it. But was that true, or was there something much more sinister going on with him? It would have been a much better movie if it turned out that he was in on "it" with Travolta's character the whole time and got away with some if the money while everyone figured him for a hero and forgave him for his bribery mistake. After all, he got the gun from the duffel bag - they didn't show if he took any money to go with it. Then, for no apparent reason, he chases down Travolta's character on foot and puts his own life in jeopardy rather than staying back and saving the passengers on the train. He says he doesn't want to shoot, but then he does and does not seem to suffer any horror or grief over what he just was forced to do to protect his own life. Also, for some reason, I did not understand - perhaps someone could explain it to me - he kept telling his wife that he would bring home a half gallon of milk despite the fact that she kept insisting it be a whole gallon. Was this some kind of code he was trying to relay to her? Was he talking code for bringing home a fortune or something like that? Finally, in the very last scene of the movie, Washington returns home with two bags in his hands. One probably had that half gallon of milk he insisted on and there was no way to know what was in the other bag. He entered his house with a smirk on his face. What was in that bag? A brick of cash from one of the bags? Did he have investments in gold in the market? I really hope some or all of this is true because my imagined version of the movie makes it much more interesting than if Washington's character was really a straight forward good guy - if that is so - then many of his actions made no sense at all!!! If someone who read the book or saw the first movie knows the truth, I'd be interested to know!
Watching this Pelham--a money job from its conception--you can believe that there's no other motivation on Earth.
Four armed men—Bashkim (Victor Gojcaj), Emri (Robert Vataj), Phil Ramos (Luis Guzmán), and their leader, Bernard Ryder (John Travolta)—hijack the lead car of a subway train in Manhattan. Ryder contacts MTA dispatcher Walter Garber (Denzel Washington) in the Rail Control Center (RCC) and demands $10 million in ransom to be delivered in one hour or they will start shooting the 19 hostages, one for each minute the money is late. The Taking of Pelham 123 is based on the 1973 novel The Taking of Pelham One Two Three by American author Morton Freedgood, writing under the pen name of John Godey. The novel was adapted for this movie by American screenwriters Brian Helgeland and David Koepp. An earlier adaptation of the novel, The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974), was released in 1974. A TV remake, The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1998), was released in 1998. Pelham refers to a local Manhattan train that departs from Pelham Bay Park. The "123" refers to the time that it leaves 1:23. The "taking" refers to a hijacking. After Garber delivers the money, the hijackers start up the train, having found a way to circumvent the dead man feature. They get off the train at the Roosevelt spur, a derelict tunnel built under the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. The train continues forward, picking up speed until the passengers become alarmed and the authorities at the MTV conclude that no one is driving the train anymore. Fortunately, the train trips a red light and stops. MTV orders all patrol cars to converge at the Roosevelt spur, where they open fire on Bashkim and Emri. Garber follows Ryder, who has hailed a taxi in which he checks his laptop to find that he has successfully shortsold the market and invested in gold, earning a huge profit. Ryder hijacks a truck and follows Ryder's cab to the Manhattan Bridge where Ryder has exited his stalled cab. Garber catches up to him on the pedestrian walkway and confronts him with a gun. Ryder demands that Garber kill him before the police do and gives him 10 seconds to shoot. At the end of the 10 seconds, Ryder reaches for his gun, and Garber shoots him. "You're my goddamn hero," Ryder says as he sinks to the ground. Later, while on his way home, Garber is stopped by the mayor (James Gandolfini) who thanks him, informs him that the city will go to bat for him in the bribery investigation, and offers him a ride home in his car. Garber takes the train instead. In the final scene, he arrives home, a half-gallon of milk in his hand. The first drafts of the script faced the challenge of updating the novel with contemporary technology, including cellphones, GPS, laptops, thermal imaging, and a post-9/11 world in New York City. In December 2007, David Koepp, who adapted the novel for Scott and Washington said: I wrote many drafts to try and put it in the present day and keep all the great execution that was there from the first one. It's thirty years later so you have to take certain things into account. Hopefully we came up with a clever way to move it to the present. Koepp's drafts were meant to be "essentially familiar" to those who read the novel, preserving the "great hero vs. villain thing" of the original. Brian Helgeland, the only one receiving credit for the screenplay, took the script in a different direction, making the remake more like the 1974 film than the novel and, as Helgeland put it, making it about "two guys who weren't necessarily all that different from each other." Whereas the novel is told from more than 30 perspectives, keeping readers off balance because it is unknown which characters the writer might suddenly discard, the two films focus on the lead hijacker and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority employee with whom he communicates by phone. The new version sharpens that focus until it's almost exclusively a duel between disgraced MTA dispatcher Walter Garber and manic gunman Ryder.

In the book and original film, Ryder is "cold-blooded and calculating", but in the 2009 film he is a "loose cannon willing to kill innocents, not out of necessity, but out of spite." Also Ryder, in the original film and book, is portrayed as a normal looking businessman, while in the 2009 film he looks like he has adopted prison life, wearing very visible prison related tattoos and very laid back modern style of a biker. In the 1974 film, the main character is named Zachary Garber and is a lieutenant in the Transit Authority police; in the 2009 film, the main character is named Walter Garber and works as a subway train dispatcher. Ryder asks for $10 million dollars instead of the $1 million as in the original film and book and $5 million in the made-for TV movie. Ryder does not use the "Mr. Blue" nickname as the original film does; it is implied that Ryder is a nickname.

a5c7b9f00b

Hope: The Last Paladin tamil pdf download
Episode 1.93 full movie hd 1080p download
Batman: Dead End full movie hd 1080p
Jackass: The Movie full movie in hindi 720p download
Animal Act full movie in hindi free download mp4
Daydreamer full movie in hindi 720p
hindi The Fisherman
the A Fistful of Whiskey full movie in hindi free download hd
Hope: The Last Paladin download movies
Ozark Sharks in hindi free download